Obama's legacy is our leverage

Obama's legacy is our leverage

Progressives must first help get the president  re-elected, then get in his face

By Tom Hayden 11/01/2012

President Barack Obama. “He’s made history. Now he has to think about legacy.” This analysis of Barack Obama came during a recent conversation I had with U.S. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Mass., who joined the civil rights movement in Mississippi back in a time when no one was talking about a black president.
Was Obama’s victory perhaps the high point of his historic contribution, opening the doors of diversity to others? For Thompson and millions of others, the answer is no. Independent progressive movements will be needed to compel Obama to act. Progressive achievements may occur where the demands of movements converge with Obama’s need for a legacy.

The need to expand democracy is essential in its own right, but also for Obama’s re-election and legacy. California has just adopted same-day registration, for example, while right-wing politicians seek to suppress the vote and hollow out the 1965 Voting Rights Act. Beyond protecting the franchise, the main target for progressive reform is the Citizens United decision, with Obama encouraging a constitutional amendment to reverse it. What progressives can do is organize state by state against Citizens United, delegitimize the authority of a partisan Republican Supreme Court, push the president for two progressive appointees, and educate a new generation of Thurgood Marshalls to attack the undemocratic notions that money is speech and corporations are people.

A re-elected Obama will plunge immediately into a maelstrom of debate on deficit reduction and taxes. If he wins, the voter mandate will be to raise taxes on the rich and preserve Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. If Obama and the Democrats don’t find ways to defend that mandate, the possibility of leaving a positive legacy will be damaged at the beginning of the second term, perhaps even stillborn.

Obama can also rely on a voter mandate to embrace the Stiglitz-Reich-Krugman school of economic thinking and support a “Robin Hood” tax on Wall Street transactions (as he once did before being smothered by his economic advisers).

From day one, Obama will need to use the bully pulpit and his executive powers if he wants a legacy of restoring progress toward reversing global warming. Given Beltway realities, progress is likely to be driven at the state and community levels in places like California, with supportive rhetoric and regulatory blessings from Obama.
Before November or shortly after, Obama’s legacy may be shaped by an Israeli attack on Iran, drawing America into regional war. Fifty-nine percent of Americans oppose joining Israel in going to war with Iran, and 70 percent oppose a unilateral U.S. attack. Obama should rely on that mandate to navigate away from the brink and toward U.N. recognition of a Palestinian state.

Obama will have to pull back 68,000 American troops from Afghanistan by 2014 or break a fundamental pledge. And if he doesn’t want a legacy of restoring Richard Nixon’s imperial presidency (and provoking Muslim rage by his drone attacks), the former constitutional lawyer will have to engage in a serious revision of the 1973 War Powers Act. He also needs to embrace an FDR “good neighbor” policy toward Latin America — including Cuba — or face diplomatic isolation from our nearest neighbors.

Finally, Obama needs to resume the quest begun in his Columbia student days to freeze and reverse the nuclear arms race, the greatest threat to humanity alongside global warming. The United States has 5,113 nuclear warheads, which will cost $352 billion to maintain and “upgrade” over the next 10 years. Obama’s opening to Russia, which GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney opposes, is merely an initial step in the process. Public opinion, inert since the 1980s nuclear freeze movement, will have to be reawakened, partly with his leadership.

A movement perspective always differs from a governing one, and in the best of times the two interact productively. Most progressives I meet believe the challenge is clear: Get Obama’s back through November, then get in his face. But legacy might be the critical factor in focusing the president’s agenda in a second term.

Author and activist Tom Hayden, a leading voice of the American left for more than five decades, served in the state Assembly (1982-1992), the state Senate (1992-2000), launched a bid for governor in the 1994 Democratic primary and ran for mayor of Los Angeles in 1997. He currently writes for The Nation and speaks out against the current wars as founder and director of the Peace and Justice Resource Center in Culver City. This article first appeared in The Nation on Oct. 2.  Visit Hayden’s Web site, tomhayden.com. 2.

DIGG | del.icio.us | REDDIT

Other Stories by Tom Hayden

Related Articles

Comments

I've never figured out why verbosity and hyperbole equates to sound thinking. This dude above is addictive to overstatement and insulting people. Oh, well.

I've never figured out also why whoever has the most money for ads, signs, and inane popups, wins. You'd think, people would see through it. Anyone who has that much money to spend on the above is not someone who has the same interests as you and me.

A piece of truthiness in the eternal class warfare:

http://www.dpcc.senate.gov/files/documen...

posted by cassandra2 on 11/03/12 @ 10:01 a.m.

Hyperbole and empty verbosity yet again.

You have the temperament of a Black Shirt and the judgment of three year old.

Someone . . .not you, you have your rhetoric where a brain should be . . .but someone could look around a bit at whose ads are all over the internet, the mailboxes, TV. everywhere in our city an empty space was--these are not signs for progressives or indeed for Democrats. The latter are there, but in much humbler proportions and number.

One votes for Democrats because politics is the art of the possible and because one does not make progress by screaming invective and insisting on what isn't possible in the moment. One votes for Democrats because they are the significantly lesser evil.

posted by cassandra2 on 11/05/12 @ 07:05 a.m.
Post A Comment

Requires free registration.

(Forgotten your password?")